Emre Yildiz

Bounded Rationality and Incrementalism. Simon and Lindblom: A contrast and evaluation of two models Emre Yildiz

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Sociology - Individual, Groups, Society, grade: 1,33, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH (School of Humanities and Social Sciences), language: English, comment: Comment of the professor: This is a excellent piece of work. Your style of writing is very effective: clear, precise and concise. Your tone is rather scholarly but that works very well for you. The essay is very well researched. You clearly have done the work and your exposition reveals a fine- grained understanding of the issues. As mentioned in the text, the discussion could have been a little more elaborate, even if we include section 6. The essay is very well organised. Be sure to state your argument in your introduction. It helps the reader navigate your essay. A very good essay: 1.33 , abstract: Agreeing with the notion that public policies are "whatever governments choose to do or not to do" (Dye, 1987, p. 1) eventuates in breaking down the academic field of public policy to the study of decision making. Whether public policy is indeed in its essence the study of decision making or not is however part of a different debate that this essay will not delve into. Nevertheless, noteworthy here is that questions such as 'who are the decision makers? How and why do they take the decisions they are taking?' have been leading research questions in public policy sciences. One theoretical framework policy scholars have long used to give answers to the questions was the rational choice theory. (...)